Researchers have surveyed the US and discovered something really interesting: there are statistically-meaningful differences in the personality types of different regions.
There are several map-charts; it's interesting to look up your state and see how close (or far) you are from your state average. North Carolina is conscientious, friendly, and not very neurotic! Virginia, on the other hand... isn't.
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Dr. Horrible
The trouble with deployments is that you spend six months or so out of touch; and then you spend the next year or so playing catch-up, finding all kinds of little things that everyone else saw ages ago.
On the other hand, getting to see cool stuff isn't bad, exactly. And better late than never!
Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog is a Joss Whedon webmovie- a short supervillain musical. It came out last July, and by every account I've read it was a huge hit.
I can see why. Aside from Whedon's name-recognition (which is undoubtedly a part of it) the play is funny and character-driven (as much as supervillain musicals can be, anyway.)
On the other hand, getting to see cool stuff isn't bad, exactly. And better late than never!
Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog is a Joss Whedon webmovie- a short supervillain musical. It came out last July, and by every account I've read it was a huge hit.
I can see why. Aside from Whedon's name-recognition (which is undoubtedly a part of it) the play is funny and character-driven (as much as supervillain musicals can be, anyway.)
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Darwinia?
Robert Charles Wilson's Darwinia: A Novel of a Very Different Twentieth Century is just that. The premise is that in 1912, the continent of Europe is replaced by an unearthly wilderness. The geography is the same, but it's been supplanted by a completely new ecosystem. All of Europe's humans and human artifacts have disappeared, and turn-of-the-century America is left to deal with the mystery.
Wilson is good at building up the bizarre situation, and showing how people try to cope with and rationalize something that they will never be able to explain. With that in mind, I would almost rather than Wilson not have explained it; the phenomenon works better as a pure mystery than as the convoluted futuristic plot that develops.
"Darwinia" is a name given the continent as a joke, which somehow sticks in spite of the American embrace of fundamentalism. (I suspect that Wilson just liked the name too much to give it up.)
Character development is decent; the plot starts off with a bracing amount of weirdness, and if it doesn't sustain that, it's nonetheless very readable throughout.
Wilson is good at building up the bizarre situation, and showing how people try to cope with and rationalize something that they will never be able to explain. With that in mind, I would almost rather than Wilson not have explained it; the phenomenon works better as a pure mystery than as the convoluted futuristic plot that develops.
"Darwinia" is a name given the continent as a joke, which somehow sticks in spite of the American embrace of fundamentalism. (I suspect that Wilson just liked the name too much to give it up.)
Character development is decent; the plot starts off with a bracing amount of weirdness, and if it doesn't sustain that, it's nonetheless very readable throughout.
Shameless Self-Promotion!
What's my blog's educational reading level? Why, I'm glad you asked!
(Yes, I do feel more intelligent now.)
(Yes, I do feel more intelligent now.)
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Steampunk
A clever article here about steampunk, and the reasons it appeals to people. Lots of good quotes; this was probably my favorite:
A lot of kids in today’s steampunk music & style scene used to identify with the goth aesthetic — and are pleasantly surprised to discover that normal adults seem intrigued by this new thing rather than alarmed. Well, yeah. People think of goths as weirdoes who take vampires too seriously, and therefore they can’t help being worried on some level that a crazy goth might, you know, want to make them bleed. Whereas steampunks are — what? Weirdoes who take pocket-watches too seriously? What are they gonna do, vehemently tell you what time it is?
Sigh. That makes me all nostalgiac for playing a mad scientist.
A lot of kids in today’s steampunk music & style scene used to identify with the goth aesthetic — and are pleasantly surprised to discover that normal adults seem intrigued by this new thing rather than alarmed. Well, yeah. People think of goths as weirdoes who take vampires too seriously, and therefore they can’t help being worried on some level that a crazy goth might, you know, want to make them bleed. Whereas steampunks are — what? Weirdoes who take pocket-watches too seriously? What are they gonna do, vehemently tell you what time it is?
Sigh. That makes me all nostalgiac for playing a mad scientist.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Politics and Moral Reasoning
This is interesting.
It's a series of polls/studies that you can take to evaluate your own moral decision-making process. Not the moral choices themselves, that is, so much as the grounds by which we make choices.
The first one, the "Moral Foundations Questionnaire," divides moral reasoning into five categories: Harm, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority, and Purity. It ranks your interest in each of these categories, and then generates a chart comparing it with the averages for liberals and conservatives.
I find this kind of thing compelling, because so many political conversations seem to involve people talking past each other. They're not connecting in some way; and I think a lot of our mutual frustration comes from that.
(Well, aside from the frustration that comes from not getting everything we want, of course. Which is also a big part of politics.)
Anyway. The differences are really striking. My entries are in green, conservatives' are in red, and liberals are blue. (Tsk, that's unreadable! Click on it to get a more legible chart.)
It's a series of polls/studies that you can take to evaluate your own moral decision-making process. Not the moral choices themselves, that is, so much as the grounds by which we make choices.
The first one, the "Moral Foundations Questionnaire," divides moral reasoning into five categories: Harm, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority, and Purity. It ranks your interest in each of these categories, and then generates a chart comparing it with the averages for liberals and conservatives.
I find this kind of thing compelling, because so many political conversations seem to involve people talking past each other. They're not connecting in some way; and I think a lot of our mutual frustration comes from that.
(Well, aside from the frustration that comes from not getting everything we want, of course. Which is also a big part of politics.)
Anyway. The differences are really striking. My entries are in green, conservatives' are in red, and liberals are blue. (Tsk, that's unreadable! Click on it to get a more legible chart.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
